« June 2009 | Main | August 2009 »

July 29, 2009

Do Financial Advisors Utilize the Same Strategies which they Recommend to Clients?

Have you ever pondered the question… does my financial advisor practice what he/she preaches? Do they utilize the same investment products and strategies which they suggest to everyone else? Do they follow the same asset allocation guidelines which they are recommending to others? I think you’ll find the results of my study quite intriguing. Over the past month I’ve spoken with a random handful of financial professionals whom I’ve met over the years to ask them how they invest personally and plan for retirement:

First, I spoke with Josh Cumrine of Butcher Hansen, LLC. Josh told me that he aims to save 15% of his gross income each year. “I invest 2 of that 15% in my 401k” he tells me. “And I take a very conservative approach by investing in all cash and money market instruments.” “Another 3 of that 15% is invested in whole life insurance policies.” While Josh told me he does have some money in slightly more volatile market investments such as bonds, for the most part he invests in ultra-conservative vehicles such as money markets, credit unions and savings accounts.

I also spoke with Dale Jacobs, a former executive with a wirehouse firm who left the business several years ago. Like Josh, Dale invests a portion of his retirement savings in stock and bond investments but, for the most part, utilizes CD’s, money markets, and savings accounts. “Working in this business for a bunch of years, sometimes you get tired of all the volatility” he told me. “Sometimes it helps you sleep easy to know that the majority of your savings are safe and sound.”

This theme of financial advisors thinking and acting conservatively would be reiterated to me several times. I found that most, almost 70% of the advisors I spoke with had a tendency towards CDs, savings accounts and money markets. The majority of stock oriented investments owned by financial advisors are inside IRAs, profit-sharing plans, 401ks and other tax-deferred investments which are generally not accessible without penalty until retirement. But not everyone thought this way:

Christine Benz, director of personal finance for Morningstar mentioned in the July 20th edition of Business Week that she has about 60% of her personal portfolio in equities. After the financial crisis, a lot of her family, friends and clients insist that they converted all their assets to cash, but she is “talking [them] out of making bad decisions.” Her strategy is for her and her clients to remain invested in equities.

A similar sentiment was reiterated by Benjamin Margolis, a former financial advisor and retirement specialist: “I follow the same advice I gave my clients—obviously.” Asset allocations have historically been based on age and as a client reaches retirement they should take on less risk. “As a guy in my late 20’s, I invest aggressively in equities and corporate bonds and have only my emergency fund (3-6 months of living expenses) in cash and money market instruments.”

--
At a more personal level, I consider my own attitude when it comes to my investment strategy. My asset allocation for my retirement accounts is 80-100% stocks at any given point. Because of my age I'm prepared to handle any level of volatility if it means greater potential for returns over the long term. Especially after the recent recession in which stock prices reached shockingly low levels, I added more money to stock market indexes to (hopefully) take advantage of what will eventually be viewed as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to buy stocks on sale.

My main strength when it comes to saving and investing is discipline. Like Josh, I aim to save 15% of my gross income each year, but I do so through an automatic investment program in which I pay myself first. All contributions to my retirement plans come out directly after each pay cycle and go into my 401k and IRA accounts. If I max out on my retirement accounts, I'll put the extra money into my savings account to beef up my emergency funds. I don't have any insurance products in my current retirement plan because I believe there are lower-cost avenues to utilize for accumulation. When I get closer to the distribution phase, I will likely consider integrating insurance products into the mix.

My conclusion after speaking with almost a dozen wealth managers and other financial professionals is that many of them tend to follow a more conservative approach than that which they preach to clients. History may show that younger investors are supposed to invest more aggressively and investors nearing retirement should be cutting their exposure to risky asset classes, but advisors seem to do what makes them feel safe and secure. My guess is that watching volatility all day long causes some advisors to become sick of it. It’s analogous to a blackjack dealer who hates to gamble. Watching the emotional rollers coaster experienced by each blackjack player probably exhausts any thrill or excitement which a dealer would get from actually playing the game.

For the record, what inspired me to first think about this topic was Suze Orman a few years back. She announced that she invests primarily in T-bills and other ultra conservative investments, even while she promotes the use of index investments and more aggressive allocations for younger investors. It surprised me that someone so famous and well-publicized wouldn’t follow the advice she was giving to America.

As always, I welcome any questions or comments.

Russell Bailyn

Wealth Manager
Premier Financial Advisors, Inc
14 E 60th Street, #402
New York, NY 10022
P: 212-752-4343 *31
F: 212-752-7673
rbailyn@premieradvisors.net

Securities and certain investment advisory services offered through: First Allied Securities, Inc., a registered Broker/Dealer. Member: FINRA/SIPC. Premier Financial Advisors, Inc. is a Registered Investment Advisor. First Allied Securities & Premier Financial Advisors are not affiliated entities.

July 23, 2009

Enough is Enough with Social Networks

What is it about Twitter that people think their businesses can flourish based upon it? As a long-time blogger with solid experience marketing myself online, I just don’t get the whole Twitter-for-business model. Scratch that—I get it, but I don’t think it has long-term potential. Most of the time it’s simply advisors sending around links to their own websites trying to get their followers to sign on as clients. Taken directly from Twitters homepage, their mission statement reads: “Twitter is a service for friends, family and co-workers to communicate and stay connected through the exchange of quick frequent answers to one simple question: What are you doing?” Employees are trying to do more than just “stay connected” with friends; they are trying to create new friends, otherwise known as clients. When I got a call recently to comment on an article regarding marketing through Twitter, I responded that I’m not jumping on that bandwagon until it becomes mainstream and an absolute necessity for my business.

Some of the newer efforts directed towards creating clients and customers through new social media have not proven effective. In my opinion, traditional websites followed by well maintained blogs have proven effective for financial advisors and other professionals. Linked-In seems to be a good business networking tool (designed for that purpose) and I even get how Facebook groups may become important for business networking in the future. But from my experience as an advisor, the most effective marketing methods are still the more traditional, time-tested methods: referrals, newsletters, seminars, advertising, etc.

Among the things that bother me about business tweeting is the following: if an employee is constantly updating their Twitter followers about what is going on with their business every few minutes, how much time are they actually dedicating to projects which require focus and attention. If I were hiring a firm to do important work for me, I wouldn’t want them twittering all day long. Do we really care how long the line at Chopt was today? Where is this fine line between business networking through online media and wasting time?

Russell Bailyn

Wealth Manager
Premier Financial Advisors, Inc
14 E 60th Street, #402
New York, NY 10022
P: 212-752-4343 *31
F: 212-752-7673
rbailyn@premieradvisors.net

Securities and certain investment advisory services offered through: First Allied Securities, Inc., a registered Broker/Dealer. Member: FINRA/SIPC. Premier Financial Advisors, Inc. is a Registered Investment Advisor. First Allied Securities & Premier Financial Advisors are not affiliated entities.

July 17, 2009

Should high net-worth individuals purchase long-term care insurance?

In the past long-term care insurance has been purchased primarily by middle and upper-middle class people. The wealthy tend to ‘self-fund’ their long-term care needs with extra assets which would otherwise be included in their estates. But now, with long-term care costs rising dramatically and over 40% of Americans 65 and older needing some sort of long term care, better planning is needed to protect assets.* If we give further consideration to increasing life-spans and the diminishing effect the recession has had on many households in the $2-5M net worth range, it may make sense for more wealthy individuals to start purchasing long-term care insurance as both a hedge against these risks and a protective measure for future giving ability.

As a refresher, long-term care insurance helps elderly individuals who are unable to perform certain daily activities pay for professional assistance if and when needed. This could be nursing care, an assisted living facility, or home care. The average cost of home care in New York is at an all-time high right now of $398 per day (Genworth Financial: 2008 Cost of Care Survey). Even this figure represents an average and not the very best accommodations which can reach as high as $500/day. Wealthy individuals tend to want the best home care and/or the best assisted living facilities which can easily surpass $100,000/year.

Even with a brief, 3-year stay in a nursing facility, high net-worth individuals may be looking at a $300,000 expenditure. Even if this is tolerable, the real cost of long-term care is not the actual cost, but the opportunity cost. In order to pay out of pocket, individuals will have to hold on to assets in their accounts. These assets, which would have been used to pay for long-term care insurance years earlier, are now stuck in the individual’s estate, which are subject to the estate tax. As the years go on, it is increasingly difficult for an individual to transfer assets out of their estate. With an estate tax of up to 55%, it may be beneficial to pay the insurance premiums and transfer the extra money out of your estate at an earlier date.

Fortunately for consumers, long-term care providers have been innovating on products and there are now more and less costly ways of purchasing long-term care insurance. Many policies now have an option to return a portion of the premium if not used. Depending on how much you’re willing to pay for the insurance now, the return of the premium option ranges from just a small portion, to the entire premium.

If you have questions about your need for long-term care insurance, feel free to contact me or your own financial advisor.

Russell Bailyn
--
Wealth Manager
Premier Financial Advisors, Inc
14 E 60th Street, #402
New York, NY 10022
P: 212-752-4343 *31
F: 212-752-7673
rbailyn@premieradvisors.net

*U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Special thanks to Brian Schuman for his contributions on this article

Securities and certain investment advisory services offered through: First Allied Securities, Inc., a registered Broker/Dealer. Member: FINRA/SIPC. Premier Financial Advisors, Inc. is a Registered Investment Advisor. First Allied Securities & Premier Financial Advisors are not affiliated entities.




Disclaimer

This site is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security, which may be referenced herein. First Allied Securities, Inc. does not endorse or support this web site, nor are they affiliated with Premier Financial Advisors. We suggest that you consult with your financial or tax advisor with regard to your individual situation. This site has been published in the United States for residents of the United States. Persons mentioned in this site may only transact business in states in which they have been properly registered or are exempt from registration.

Securities offered through First Allied Securities, Inc., a registered broker/dealer. Member FINRA / SIPC. Advisery services offered through: Premier Financial Advisors is a NY Registered Investment Advisor. Form ADV part II is available upon request.

Links are being provided for information purposes only. Premier Financial Advisors is not affiliated with and does not endorse, authorize or sponsor any of the listed websites or their respective sponsors. Premier Financial Advisors is not responsible for the content of any website or the collection or use of information regarding website's users and/or members.

Credit Card Applications
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Seeking Alpha Certified

investing channel